|
|
Military News
With
Troops’
Freedom
to
Choose
Beneficiaries
Comes
Greater
Responsibility
By
John J.
Kruzel
American
Forces
Press
Service
|
|
WASHINGTON,
May 2008
–
Starting
in July,
servicemembers
can
choose
to whom
a
$100,000
death
gratuity
will be
disbursed
if
they’re
killed
in
action.
Currently,
troops
can
assign
half the
posthumous
payment
to
recipients
of their
preference,
with the
remainder
paid
according
to a
hierarchy
determined
by the
Defense
Department:
first to
the
spouse,
or if
unmarried,
to
children,
then
grandchildren,
followed
by
parents
and,
barring
these
antecedents,
the next
of kin.
But when
the
policy
shift
becomes
effective
July 1,
troops
should
use
caution
while
exercising
their
new
freedom
to
bequeath,
one
Pentagon
official
warned.
“I
think
that
members
need to
realize
that,
with
this
added
flexibility,
there is
responsibility,”
Gary
McGee, a
program
analyst
for the
Compensation
Directorate
in the
Office
of
Military
Personnel
Policy,
said in
an
interview
yesterday.
“They
need to
act in a
mature
manner
when
they
make
these
decisions.”
Congress
established
the
first
death
gratuity
in 1908,
stipulating
that
survivors
of Army,
Navy and
Marine
personnel
killed
in
service
receive
the
equivalent
of six
months
of the
servicemembers’
pay. The
original
purpose
was to
help
fill the
financial
gap
resulting
from the
lack of
a
government
life
insurance
program
at that
time,
according
background
papers
on
military
compensation.
Survivors
of
military
personnel
who die
as a
result
of
hostile
actions
in a
designated
combat
operation
or
combat
zone or
while
training
for
combat
or
performing
hazardous
duty are
eligible
for the
benefit.
The
payout
grew
from a
$3,000
minimum
in 1956
to a
standard
$6,000
benefit
for
families
of
fallen
Persian
Gulf War
participants,
to a
$12,420
disbursement
in 2004.
In a
dramatic
leap the
next
year, a
retroactive
gratuity
was
established
to pay
$100,000
to
survivors
of those
who died
since
Oct. 1,
2002,
covering
the more
than
4,450
Americans
killed
in Iraq
and
Afghanistan.
Lawmakers
decided
to
increase
the
gratuity’s
dollar
amount,
McGee
said, to
more
closely
resemble
the
large
payments
being
disbursed
to
families
of Sept.
11,
2001,
terrorist
attack
victims.
The
six-figure
disbursement
is
distributed
by the
Defense
Financing
and
Accounting
Service,
which
aims to
pay
beneficiaries
within
48 hours
of a
servicemember’s
death.
When the
policy
takes
effect
this
summer,
each
service
branch
will
adopt a
revised
version
of
Department
of
Defense
Form 93,
known as
the
Record
of
Emergency
Data.
Troops
will
then be
able to
select
up to 10
beneficiaries
--
regardless
of
relationships
--
allotting
the
whole of
the
$100,000
in
10-percent
increments.
Mark
Ward,
the
senior
program
manager
of the
Casualty,
Mortuary
and
Military
Funeral
Honors
section
of the
Pentagon’s
Military
Community
and
Family
Policy
Office,
said the
new
procedure
could
have
good or
bad
repercussions,
depending
on
whether
troops
uphold
the
death
gratuity’s
“true
intent.”
“Take
the case
where
you have
a spouse
and two
children,
and yet
the
member
says,
‘Well,
I had 10
great
buddies
on my
baseball
team in
high
school;
I’m
going to
give
each of
them
$10,000,’”
he said
an
interview
yesterday.
“So
now all
$100,000
is paid
to his
buddies,
and
he’s
still
got a
wife and
kids,
and
they’ve
got no
money.”
Single-parent
servicemembers
without
a spouse
heir may
embrace
the new
policy
more
readily
than
their
married
counterparts
in the
armed
forces.
The most
recent
available
data
shows
that 249
single-parent
troops
have
died in
U.S.
operations
since
October
2002,
and
15,922
are
deployed.
Ward
said the
new
policy
allows
greater
flexibility
to all
demographic
groups
of the
armed
forces
who die
serving
their
country.
“The
overall
thrust
is to
give the
service
member
the
greatest
latitude
to
determine
who gets
his or
her
benefits
upon
their
death,”
he said.
|
|
Related
Sites:
Office
of Military
Personnel Policy
|
Homeland
Defense Foundation
Helps Military
Families
By
Samantha L. Quigley
American Forces Press
Service
|
|
WASHINGTON,
July 2007 –
The National Homeland
Defense Foundation
distributed more than
$500,000 in temporary
financial assistance
to over 300 families
of deployed military
personnel since 2005,
according to the
foundation’s
president.
“We
have hundreds of
heart-warming
anecdotes resulting
from our program,”
Donald E. Addy said.
Founded in 2004, the
National Homeland
Defense Foundation is
a new member of
America Supports You,
a Defense Department
program connecting
citizens and
corporations that
support military
personnel and their
families serving at
home and abroad.
In addition to the
financial assistance,
the foundation also
offers military
families educational
and emotional support
through its outreach
programs.
But the foundation is
not only involved in
troop support
activities. Through
its humanitarian,
security and
preparedness programs,
the foundation aims to
“secure the future
of liberty” for the
United States,
according to its Web
site.
“Our primary
activity is conducting
an annual symposium,
which has become the
nation’s leading
public forum on
homeland defense (and)
homeland security,”
Addy said. “(This
year’s symposium)
topics include border
security, maritime
domain awareness and
port security.”
Other topics include
educational
initiatives in
homeland defense and
security as well as
“Winning the War of
Ideas,” Addy said.
The foundation has
invited top-levels
government officials
to speak at the event
as well, including
Defense Secretary
Robert Gates and
Homeland Security
Secretary Michael
Chertoff.
The foundation
will hold a
one-day
first-responders
conference before
the symposium.
“First Responders
and the War on
Terror,” will
address topics
pertinent to issues
facing law
enforcement, fire and
emergency personnel,
as well as regional
National Guardsmen.
There is no
registration fee for
the conference.
|
|
Related Sites:
The
National Homeland Defense
Foundation
|
|
|
Chairman
Still Motivated, Inspired by Troops
By
Linda D. Kozaryn
American Forces Press Service
|
|
CHICAGO,
May 2007 – What keeps a military man
like Marine Gen. Peter Pace,
motivated? For the Vietnam veteran
with nearly 40 years service who now
serves as the military’s
highest-ranking officer, the answer to
such a question is simple: talking to
the troops.
|

Dr. Edward Snyder,
dean of the Chicago
Graduate School of
Business, introduces
Marine Gen. Peter
Pace, chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff,
as the keynote speaker
at the University of
Chicago School of
Business’ 55th
annual management
conference in Chicago,
May 18. Photo by Staff
Sgt. D. Myles Cullen,
USAF
|
|
“Serving the nation’s men and
women in uniform is not a burden;
it’s an honor, and I’m proud to
have the opportunity to do it,” Pace
told about 1,000 students and alumni
here today attending the 55th annual
management conference of the
University of Chicago Graduate School
of Business.
Following his speech on leadership,
Pace answered questions from the
audience. He talked about how he keeps
his balance, his mentors, ways the
public can support the troops and how
he makes himself available to the
American people.
Since being commissioned in June 1967
after graduating from the U.S. Naval
Academy, Pace has served at every
level of military command. In
September 2005, he became the first
Marine to be appointed as chairman of
the Joint Chiefs of Staff. In this
position, he serves as the principal
military advisor to the president, the
defense secretary and the National
Security Council.
Asked how he balances the daily
pressures of his duties in Washington,
Pace said he turns to two pictures
under the glass on his desk.
One is of Marine Lance Cpl. Guido
Farinaro, who died in Vietnam in July
1968 while following the orders of 2nd
Lt. Peter Pace. The other is Pfc.
Keith Matthew Maupin, declared missing
after an April 9, 2004, convoy attack
near Baghdad, who up until last week,
was the only unaccounted-for soldier
in Iraq. Three other soldiers have
been missing since a May 12 ambush.
“I keep my balance by remembering my
responsibilities,” he said. “We
work with some incredible young men
and women. If I ever start feeling
down for any reason, all I’ve got to
do is get up from behind my desk, walk
out into the corridor, stop the first
person walking by and just talk to
him, and that boosts me incredibly.”
Asked who his mentors have been, Pace
replied that there have been many, so
he would only name a few. The first he
chose to mention were the young men
like Farinaro who served under him in
combat and died.
“It is their sacrifice for this
country that has kept me on active
duty,” he said. “When I question
how I serve or whether I should serve,
the memory of what I owe them is very
strong in what I decide to do next.”
Pace said a Marine captain named Chuck
Meadows taught him to make decisions.
He also noted that he’d worked for
former Army Chief of Staff Gen. Dennis
Reimer when Reimer was a two-star
general in Korea.
“He invested his leadership time in
helping me understand my potential,”
Pace said. “Every chance he has had
a chance to say something nice about
me, to be supportive of me, to point
people in my direction, he has
done.”
Pace said he tries to give back in
return the help and guidance he’s
been given by Meadows, Reimer and
others to the young people coming up
in the military today.
When a woman asked how people could
best support the troops, Pace replied,
“You just did.”
“Whenever I travel to see the
troops,” he explained, “they ask,
‘Are the American people still with
us?’ Not, ‘What do the people
think about the war we’re in?’
But, ‘Do they still value our
service as military men and women?’
“And it’s questions like (yours)
and other comments of support that
I’ve gotten here so far today, that
allows me to tell them,
‘Absolutely.’”
There are many ways to show support
for the troops, he added. When people
thank troops they see at the airports,
it resonates. When people send
packages, when school children send
notes and letters, that word gets out.
For specific ways to show support, he
told the audience to go to
www.AmericaSupportsYou.com, a Defense
Department Web site that lists
home-front groups that help support
the troops. In Chicago, for example,
he said, people can help the Marine
Corps Law Enforcement Foundation,
which gives the children of fallen
servicemembers scholarships.
“Thank you for asking that
question,” Pace told the woman.
“Retention and recruiting in the
armed forces right now is solid, but
it is fragile.” He said the troops
believe in the mission they’ve got,
and “they believe the American
people appreciate their service even
if they don’t agree on the specifics
of the conflict.”
When one member of the audience asked
Pace if he wouldn’t be better off
back in Washington dealing with the
war than here talking with business
leaders, the slightly stunned audience
broke out in chatter. But the chairman
wasn’t taken aback.
“I’ve already learned a couple of
things today that, had I not come
here, I would not know,” he replied.
Prior to giving his speech, he noted
that he’d met first with a small
group of military veterans now
associated with the school and then
with a group of student leaders. In
both of those forums, he said, he had
question-and-answer periods that
helped him better understand some
issues.
“Each of us have to divide our time
in ways that we feel are
beneficial,” Pace said. “I need to
determine how best to spend my time,
to include how much of my time I
should make myself available to the
citizens of the United States to be
able to ask me their questions in
forums like this outside of
Washington, D.C.
“For me, this is time well spent,
because I am learning and I’m also
making myself available to the
American people, as I believe our
senior leadership should do,” he
concluded.
|
|
Biographies:
Gen.
Peter Pace, USMC
Related Sites:
Photo
Essay
Related Articles:
Pace
Says ‘Surge’ Progress Will Be Evident by
September
Pace
Speaks on Leadership at Chicago Grad School
|
|
Military
Transformation Requires Cultural Change
By
Steven Donald Smith
American Forces Press Service
|
|
WASHINGTON,
June 2006
–
To be sure, the Defense Department's
transformation initiative is about improving
military technology, mobility, lethality and
speed to meet the 21st century's asymmetrical
threats. But it is a cultural transformation
as well.
"Transformation
is really about cultural changes as much as
anything else," said Thomas Hone, the
Defense Department's Office of Force
Transformation assistant director for risk
management, in a June 6 interview. "It
means a change in people to maximize their
potential."
Changing
the way people think about their work will
yield better results, he added.
Transformation
is a continuing process that does not have an
end point. The evolution of concepts,
processes, organizations and technology are
all part of transformation. Change in any one
of these areas necessitates change in all,
military officials said.
Hone
said that when Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld arrived for his second tour as
Pentagon chief in 2001, he was on the vanguard
of military transformation.
"He
had an intuition," Hone said of Rumsfeld.
"And I think the intuition was correct.
That intuition was that people could do things
very different and the results would be
dramatic."
Because
transformation represents a shift in
fundamental and long-held conventions, it has
not been welcome by everyone.
In
his commencement speech May 31 at the Air
Force Academy, Rumsfeld reiterated that the
U.S. must continue to transform and streamline
its military forces to meet future challenges.
He then pointed out that some people will
always be resistant to change and urged the
airmen to challenge inherited assumptions and
seek out better approaches.
"I
urge you to make that the bedrock of your
careers," Rumsfeld said during his
graduation remarks.
Hone
credits the former director of the Office of
Force Transformation, retired Navy Vice Adm.
Arthur K. Cebrowski, who died in November, for
having the broad vision for force
transformation. "One of the things that
struck him over his long and very successful
military career was the way in which war
itself was changing," Hone said.
For
instance, in the late 1980s and early 1990s,
Cebrowski was intrigued by the Revolution in
Military Affairs, a theory about the future of
warfare. During this time period, the ability
to get information on enemy positions became
so absolute that large amounts of ordnance
were no longer needed to destroy a target.
"Information
can displace firepower," Hone said.
"You don't need so much firepower,
because you know where the target is and you
can hit it with precision munitions. You find
a target and then you attack it. You'd do all
of this in a matter of minutes instead of in a
matter of hours or days."
Hone
said transformed concepts and technologies
have already been put to good use in Iraq.
Joint close-air support is provided to ground
troops around the clock and in all weather
conditions. "Technology and organization
makes this possible," he said.
The
quick toppling of Saddam Hussein's regime in
2003 is another example of transformation at
work. "A relatively small military
knocking over the Army of Iraq and removing
the regime there from power," Hone said.
"That was done with just a little more
than 130,000 troops. That's not very much when
you're talking about a country of 26 million (people)."
He
also stressed the positive impact
transformation will have on the U.S. Army as
it moves toward brigades that are designed to
be highly mobile, self-sufficient and
interchangeable.
"You
will be able to pull one out and put another
in its place," Hone said. "(It's) as
though you were pulling a brick out of a wall
and putting another back in."
Had
the U.S. military had current capabilities
during World War II, it could have ended the
war in Europe in the fall of 1944 instead of
the spring of 1945, Hone said.
"If
you could go back to the spring of 1944 and
tell General (George S.) Patton that 'We can
offer you day-and-night, all-weather,
precision bombing. We can offer you
coordination between ground and air. We can
offer you all the logistics you need when you
need it. We'll anticipate what you'll need so
it will show up on time. We will offer you
combat replacements, so that as soldiers get
tired they get replaced by other soldiers who
understand the situation.' If you had gone to
him and said all that in April 1944, he'd have
grabbed every piece of it and the war in
Europe would have been over in October
1944," Hone said.
This
wish list of hypothetical offerings to Patton
is now becoming a reality, he said.
"And
that's what we're talking about now,"
Hone said. "We're talking about getting
real intelligence on the enemy in real time.
We're talking about making sure that everybody
at every level has a shared operating picture."
|
|
Related Site:
DoD
Transformation
Nation
to Honor Fallen During National Moment of
Remembrance
By
Paul X. Rutz
American Forces Press Service
|
|
WASHINGTON,
May 2006
–
On May 29, Americans will pause together to
remember servicemembers from wars past and
present who have given the ultimate sacrifice
while defending the nation.
The
National Moment of Remembrance takes place for
one minute each year on Memorial Day, starting
at 3 p.m., local time.
"The
time 3 p.m. was chosen because it is the time
when most Americans are enjoying their
freedoms on the national holiday,"
according to a news release from the White
House Commission on Remembrance. "The
moment does not replace traditional Memorial
Day events; rather, it is an act of national
unity in which all Americans, alone or with
family and friends, honor those who died for
our freedom."
Observing
the moment can be as simple as ringing a bell
three times or pausing for a moment of silence,
the news release said. Americans are
encouraged to ask others to remember,
including family, friends and co-workers.
Established
by Congress in December 2000, the White House
Commission on Remembrance encourages Americans
to remember the sacrifices of its fallen
military members, as well as the families they
leave behind. According to its mission
statement, the commission "promotes acts
of remembrance throughout the year and asks
Americans to pay our debt of gratitude in
memory of our fallen by giving something back
to the nation."
The
idea for the program came in May 1996 when the
commission's director, Carmella LaSpada, asked
children touring the nation's capital what
Memorial Day meant to them. "That's the
day the pool opens," they said.
Providing
a sense of history to America's citizens and
ensuring younger generations remember the
sacrifices made to preserve their freedom is a
major goal, the news release said.
In
addition to the National Moment of Remembrance,
the commission has promoted other programs. In
June 2004, the commission sponsored a "historically
accurate" sand sculpture on Normandy
Beach, France, to commemorate the 60th
Anniversary of D-Day, according to its Web
site. Sand sculptors worked for six days,
making a 30-foot by 30-foot sculpture of
allied troops storming the beach.
The
commission employs cartoonists to create new,
limited-edition cartoons for a calendar each
year. It also partners with Dear Abby to send
messages of support to the nation's troops.
|
|
Related Sites:
White House
Commission on Remembrance
Operation
Dear Abby
DoD
Top News
.Bush
to realign overseas troops
American Forces Press Service
Stuttgart, Germany — President Bush unveiled a historic
realignment of U.S. troops overseas Monday, a move he said
would create a more agile, lethal fighting force while
easing burdens on military families.
Bush said the plan, the most comprehensive U.S. troop shift since the end of the Cold War, would make U.S. forces quicker to respond to threats in the war on terrorism. As many as 70,000 troops and 100,000 family members and civilian workers would return from bases in Europe and Asia.
"The world has changed a great deal, and our posture must change with it," Bush told the Veterans of Foreign Wars, "for the sake of our military families, for the sake of our taxpayers and so we can be more effective in projecting our strength and spreading freedom."
The global realignment includes plans to close some unspecified bases and use others in Eastern Europe as transit points to send forces quickly from the United States to trouble spots.
The president's announcement, coming amid Republican criticism of Democrat John Kerry's fitness to be commander in chief, also served a political purpose, particularly given that the VFW's 105th annual convention took place in a hotly contested state. Kerry addresses the VFW on Wednesday.
Bush has been making regular campaign appearances that emphasize his credentials as commander in chief and leader of the war on terrorism. A week ago, Bush nominated Rep. Porter Goss,
R-Fla., to head the CIA. On Aug. 2, he endorsed some of the recommendations of the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 attacks.
Retired Army general Wesley Clark, a Kerry supporter who once headed NATO forces in Europe, called Bush's proposal "pure politics." He called it "a slap in the face of the Europeans" and "more unilateralism on the part of the administration."
Bush said the troop realignment would alleviate some hardships that servicemembers suffer from frequent transfers and time away from families.
Kerry and his aides have criticized the administration for what they see as
over reliance on National Guard and reserve troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, where many are on extended tours that have created problems for families.
"Our servicemembers will have more time on the home front and more predictability more time for their kids and to spend time with their families at home," Bush said.
The plan, to be implemented over 10 years, would not affect the 172,500 troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Bush dismissed Kerry's pledge to bring an unspecified number of troops home from Iraq in his first six months in office. Bush said it "sends the wrong signal to the enemy, who can easily wait six months and one day. Sends the wrong message to our troops, that completing the mission may not be necessary. Sends the wrong message to the Iraqi people, who wonder whether America means what it says."
The Kerry camp says Bush is mischaracterizing the pledge by leaving out Kerry's conditions.
The realignment plan would affect many of the 200,000 U.S. troops abroad. About half are in Europe, including 70,000 in Germany. The Pentagon told German officials this year that it was thinking about replacing two Army divisions there with smaller, more mobile units. Sophisticated weaponry would be sent to some bases to make up for troop reductions.
|
|
|
Other
Military News Sites:
Aviation Week
& Space Tech
The Defense
Monitor
| |